mirror of
https://github.com/lukaszraczylo/traefikoidc.git
synced 2026-06-05 22:44:17 +00:00
ae59a5e88a
* Add ability to disable replay protection. - This is useful for runs with multiple traefik replicas to avoid false positives and tokens re-creation. * Enhance the CI/CD pipelines * Increase test coverage. * Update vendored dependencies. * Update behaviour on forceHTTPS as per issue #82
124 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
124 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
## Description
|
|
|
|
<!-- Provide a brief description of the changes in this PR -->
|
|
|
|
## Type of Change
|
|
|
|
<!-- Mark the relevant option with an "x" -->
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
|
|
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
|
|
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
|
|
- [ ] Documentation update
|
|
- [ ] Performance improvement
|
|
- [ ] Code refactoring
|
|
- [ ] Security fix
|
|
- [ ] Provider-specific fix/enhancement
|
|
|
|
## Related Issues
|
|
|
|
<!-- Link to related issues using #issue_number -->
|
|
|
|
Fixes #
|
|
Related to #
|
|
|
|
## Changes Made
|
|
|
|
<!-- List the main changes made in this PR -->
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
## Provider Impact
|
|
|
|
<!-- If this affects specific OIDC providers, list them here -->
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Google
|
|
- [ ] Azure AD
|
|
- [ ] Auth0
|
|
- [ ] Okta
|
|
- [ ] Keycloak
|
|
- [ ] AWS Cognito
|
|
- [ ] GitLab
|
|
- [ ] GitHub
|
|
- [ ] Generic OIDC
|
|
- [ ] All providers
|
|
|
|
## Testing Performed
|
|
|
|
<!-- Describe the tests you ran to verify your changes -->
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Unit tests pass locally
|
|
- [ ] Integration tests pass locally
|
|
- [ ] Race detector shows no issues
|
|
- [ ] Memory leak tests pass
|
|
- [ ] Manual testing performed
|
|
|
|
### Test Configuration
|
|
|
|
<!-- Provide details about your test configuration if applicable -->
|
|
|
|
**Provider tested:**
|
|
**Go version:**
|
|
**Traefik version:**
|
|
|
|
## Security Considerations
|
|
|
|
<!-- Describe any security implications of these changes -->
|
|
|
|
- [ ] This PR does not introduce security vulnerabilities
|
|
- [ ] Security scanning has been performed
|
|
- [ ] Credentials/secrets are properly handled
|
|
- [ ] Input validation is implemented
|
|
|
|
## Performance Impact
|
|
|
|
<!-- Describe any performance implications -->
|
|
|
|
- [ ] No performance impact expected
|
|
- [ ] Performance improved (describe how)
|
|
- [ ] Performance may be affected (describe why and mitigation)
|
|
|
|
## Breaking Changes
|
|
|
|
<!-- If this is a breaking change, describe the impact and migration path -->
|
|
|
|
**Breaking changes:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Migration guide:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Checklist
|
|
|
|
<!-- Ensure all items are checked before requesting review -->
|
|
|
|
- [ ] My code follows the project's code style
|
|
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
|
|
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
|
|
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
|
|
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
|
|
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
|
|
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
|
|
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published
|
|
|
|
## Additional Context
|
|
|
|
<!-- Add any other context, screenshots, or information about the PR here -->
|
|
|
|
## Screenshots (if applicable)
|
|
|
|
<!-- Add screenshots to help explain your changes -->
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**For Reviewers:**
|
|
|
|
Please verify:
|
|
- [ ] Code quality and style
|
|
- [ ] Test coverage is adequate
|
|
- [ ] Security implications reviewed
|
|
- [ ] Documentation is updated
|
|
- [ ] No performance regressions
|