3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
lukaszraczylo 72e2b682bb fix: eliminate per-request global mutexes in Yaegi hot paths
The v1.0.14 fix replaced one contended sync.RWMutex (RefreshCoordinator.
refreshMutex) with sync.Map. Production showed the same death-spiral
signature recurring ~2 hours later — same shape, different mutex:
65 goroutines stuck on a sync.(*RWMutex).Lock at one address, pod
pinned at 1000m CPU, identical Yaegi runCfg/reflect.Value.Call stack
pattern. The mutex was RefreshCoordinator.attemptsMutex.

Generalising: under Yaegi (interpreted Go for traefik plugins), any
per-request global mutex acquisition is a latent serialization point.
reflect.Value.Call dispatch on a held lock turns a microsecond
critical section into a multi-millisecond one, and on a GOMAXPROCS=1
pod the queue is unbounded.

This commit removes every per-request global mutex on the hot path:

1. RefreshCoordinator.attemptsMutex (sync.RWMutex)
   sessionRefreshAttempts: map -> sync.Map.
   refreshAttemptTracker: all fields atomic (int32, int64 UnixNano,
   cooldownEndNano == 0 as the not-in-cooldown sentinel, replacing
   the inCooldown bool).
   isInCooldown / recordRefreshAttempt / recordRefreshSuccess /
   recordRefreshFailure all become lock-free. Cooldown entry uses
   CompareAndSwapInt64 so only one goroutine logs the transition.

2. RefreshCircuitBreaker.mutex (sync.RWMutex)
   lastFailureTime / lastSuccessTime -> atomic.Int64 UnixNano.
   state and failures already atomic.
   AllowRequest / RecordSuccess / RecordFailure now pure atomic ops.

3. TraefikOidc.firstRequestMutex (sync.Mutex)
   firstRequestReceived bool -> firstRequestStarted int32.
   metadataRefreshStarted bool -> metadataRefreshStartedAtomic int32.
   ServeHTTP bootstrap path uses CompareAndSwapInt32 — fires once,
   zero steady-state cost. Previously the mutex was acquired on
   every non-health request forever.

4. TraefikOidc.metadataRetryMutex (sync.Mutex)
   lastMetadataRetryTime time.Time -> lastMetadataRetryNano int64.
   The 30-second retry throttle is now a CAS on lastMetadataRetryNano.

cleanupStaleEntries iterates via sync.Map.Range; eviction is a
CompareAndDelete by pointer identity so a tracker freshly re-used by
a concurrent caller is not lost.

Empirical evidence (3 specialist-agent analysis of the v1.0.14 spike,
profiles in /tmp/traefik-spike-1779511683/):
  * mutex profile: 97% delay in sync.(*Mutex).Unlock via
    HTTPHandlerSwitcher -> accesslog -> metrics -> backoff.RetryNotify
  * 65 stuck goroutines at one RWMutex address (0x40022eb648),
    identical Yaegi CFG pointer, all on rc.attemptsMutex via
    recordRefreshAttempt + isInCooldown
  * traffic driver: long-lived in-cluster Go-http-client doing
    ~5.4 req/s POST embeddings via OIDC cookie session → same
    sessionID → contention all funnels to one tracker entry

Yaegi support for sync/atomic confirmed at
github.com/traefik/yaegi@v0.16.1/stdlib/go1_22_sync_atomic.go:
AddInt32/Int64, LoadInt32/Int64, StoreInt32/Int64,
CompareAndSwapInt32/Int64 all exposed via reflect.ValueOf. Yaegi
dispatches each call through reflect.Value.Call to the COMPILED
atomic.* function, which executes a single hardware CAS/LOCK-XADD
instruction. Each atomic op still pays Yaegi dispatch cost but
cannot block — no queueing, no death spiral.

Trade-off acknowledged: v1.0.15 issues ~6-8 atomic/sync.Map ops per
leader-path request vs the 4 mutex ops of v1.0.14. Under low
contention this is a modest CPU bump. Under high contention it's
an unbounded → bounded transformation. Net win.

All tests pass with -race; golangci-lint clean.
2026-05-23 10:47:21 +01:00
lukaszraczylo 6efb78b7a8 Smarter approach to the cookies (#103)
* Smarter approach to the cookies

  - Single maxCookieSize = 1400 constant with clear documentation
  - Combined cookie storage for ~40-45% size reduction
  - Backward compatible migration from legacy cookies

* Tuneup the code.
2025-12-12 18:35:06 +00:00
lukaszraczylo c3f23cb99b Release 0.7.5 (#70)
* Resolve issue with opaque tokens not being parsed correctly

* Increase test coverage

* Further improvements to test coverage and code quality

* Add new providers.

* fixup! Add new providers.

* Cleanup.

* fixup! Cleanup.

* fixup! fixup! Cleanup.

* fixup! fixup! fixup! Cleanup.

* fixup! fixup! fixup! fixup! Cleanup.

* Memory management optimisation

24 bytes per Put < 256-4096 bytes per buffer allocation avoided (10-170x difference)

* Pooling cleanup.
2025-10-01 12:13:10 +01:00