mirror of
https://github.com/lukaszraczylo/traefik-llmgateway.git
synced 2026-10-12 04:54:45 +00:00
Add resp.go: a minimal stdlib-only RESP2 client (respClient) for a single Redis-compatible server. It lazily dials one mutex-guarded connection, applies 2s dial/read/write deadlines, sends AUTH (if a password is set) then SELECT on every new connection, and reconnects once on any I/O error before giving up. do and pipeline encode commands as "*N\r\n$len\r\n..." and decode +/-/:/$/* replies. Add redis_store.go: redisStore implements counterStore over respClient. incrBy pipelines INCRBY and EXPIRE in one round trip and returns INCRBY's value; get treats a missing key (RESP null bulk) as 0. Wire the limiter's fail-open/fail-closed policy in limits.go, which Task 5 stored but never read: a configured store's error now routes through storeIncrBy/storeGet. failOpen=true falls back to the in-process memoryStore transparently; failOpen=false makes checkAndCount return a storeDown violation and makes account drop the sample. Both paths log through an injectable, 30s-rate-limited logf. Wire newGateway (llmgateway.go) to build a redisStore-backed limiter when Config.Redis is set (password through resolveSecret, failOpen defaulting to true unless RedisConfig.FailOpen says otherwise) and a memory-only limiter otherwise, and to route pricing.go's unknown-model warnings through the gateway's own logf. Validate LimitsConfig at construction: a new LimitsConfig.validate rejects a negative int64 count limit or a negative/NaN/Inf cost limit, called from newAuthStore for every group and every user (inline and file-sourced) so a malformed limit is a constructor error instead of silently behaving as unlimited. Add RequestsPerDay, TokensPerMonth, and CostPerMonthUSD enforcement tests alongside the existing per-minute/day/cost-per-day cases, plus an erroringStore-backed test pair proving the fail-open (fallback counted) and fail-closed (storeDown violation) branches directly. Folded the validation work into this single commit rather than a second one: it interleaves with the fail-open changes across limits.go, limits_test.go, and llmgateway_test.go closely enough that splitting by hunk would be artificial.
544 lines
20 KiB
Go
544 lines
20 KiB
Go
package traefikllmgateway
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"errors"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"math"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterRequestWindow is the brief's Step-1 case: a per-minute
|
|
// request limit blocks the third request in a window and resets on the
|
|
// next window.
|
|
func TestLimiterRequestWindow(t *testing.T) {
|
|
now := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 0, 30, 0, time.UTC)
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true) // nil store → uses fallback memoryStore
|
|
l.nowFn = func() time.Time { return now }
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "a", limits: &LimitsConfig{RequestsPerMinute: 2}}}
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("1st should pass")
|
|
}
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("2nd should pass")
|
|
}
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("3rd should violate")
|
|
}
|
|
now = now.Add(time.Minute) // next window
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("new window should pass")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterTokenBudget is the brief's Step-1 case: accounting tokens
|
|
// past a day budget makes the next check refuse.
|
|
func TestLimiterTokenBudget(t *testing.T) {
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "group", id: "g", limits: &LimitsConfig{TokensPerDay: 100}}}
|
|
l.account(scopes, usage{prompt: 60, completion: 50}, 0) // 110 > 100
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("over token budget must refuse")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterCostBudget mirrors TestLimiterTokenBudget for a cost budget:
|
|
// accounting micro-USD cost past a day budget makes the next check refuse,
|
|
// and the violation carries the day window's Retry-After.
|
|
func TestLimiterCostBudget(t *testing.T) {
|
|
now := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 0, 30, 0, time.UTC)
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
l.nowFn = func() time.Time { return now }
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "u", limits: &LimitsConfig{CostPerDayUSD: 1.00}}}
|
|
|
|
l.account(scopes, usage{}, 1_500_000) // $1.50 > $1.00 budget
|
|
v := l.checkAndCount(scopes)
|
|
if v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("over cost budget must refuse")
|
|
}
|
|
wantRetry := int(time.Date(2026, 8, 21, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC).Sub(now).Seconds())
|
|
if v.retryAfter != wantRetry {
|
|
t.Errorf("retryAfter = %d, want %d (seconds to next UTC midnight)", v.retryAfter, wantRetry)
|
|
}
|
|
if v.storeDown {
|
|
t.Error("storeDown must be false in this task")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterNilLimitsUnlimited asserts a scope with limits == nil never
|
|
// blocks a request, however many times it is checked — request counters
|
|
// still climb unboundedly but nothing evaluates them.
|
|
func TestLimiterNilLimitsUnlimited(t *testing.T) {
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "unlimited", limits: nil}}
|
|
for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ {
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("iteration %d: nil limits must never violate, got %+v", i, v)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterUserOverridesAlongsideGroup asserts checkAndCount evaluates
|
|
// every scope it is given in one call: a tight user limit blocks the
|
|
// request even though the group scope in the same call is unlimited, and
|
|
// an unlimited user scope still lets a tight group limit block.
|
|
func TestLimiterUserOverridesAlongsideGroup(t *testing.T) {
|
|
now := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
|
|
|
|
t.Run("tight user limit blocks despite unlimited group", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
l.nowFn = func() time.Time { return now }
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{
|
|
{kind: "user", id: "u1", limits: &LimitsConfig{RequestsPerMinute: 1}},
|
|
{kind: "group", id: "g1", limits: nil},
|
|
}
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("1st request should pass")
|
|
}
|
|
v := l.checkAndCount(scopes)
|
|
if v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("2nd request should violate the user's tight limit")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("tight group limit blocks despite unlimited user", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
l.nowFn = func() time.Time { return now }
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{
|
|
{kind: "user", id: "u2", limits: nil},
|
|
{kind: "group", id: "g2", limits: &LimitsConfig{RequestsPerMinute: 1}},
|
|
}
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("1st request should pass")
|
|
}
|
|
v := l.checkAndCount(scopes)
|
|
if v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("2nd request should violate the group's tight limit")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterRetryAfter checks the Retry-After computation directly for
|
|
// each window kind: seconds to the next minute boundary, next UTC
|
|
// midnight, and the first of next month UTC.
|
|
func TestLimiterRetryAfter(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
now time.Time
|
|
window string
|
|
want int
|
|
}{
|
|
{"minute boundary", time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 0, 30, 0, time.UTC), windowMin, 30},
|
|
{"day boundary", time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 23, 59, 0, 0, time.UTC), windowDay, 60},
|
|
{"month boundary, 31-day month", time.Date(2026, 8, 31, 23, 59, 59, 0, time.UTC), windowMonth, 1},
|
|
{"month boundary, mid-month", time.Date(2026, 2, 15, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC), windowMonth, int(14 * 24 * time.Hour / time.Second)}, // Feb 2026 (not a leap year) runs Feb1-Mar1 = 28 days; Feb15 is 14 days before Mar1
|
|
}
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if got := retryAfterSeconds(c.now, c.window); got != c.want {
|
|
t.Errorf("retryAfterSeconds(%v, %q) = %d, want %d", c.now, c.window, got, c.want)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterRequestLimitRetryAfter asserts a request-limit violation
|
|
// (not a budget violation) also carries the correct Retry-After for its
|
|
// window.
|
|
func TestLimiterRequestLimitRetryAfter(t *testing.T) {
|
|
now := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 0, 30, 0, time.UTC)
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
l.nowFn = func() time.Time { return now }
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "a", limits: &LimitsConfig{RequestsPerMinute: 1}}}
|
|
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("1st should pass")
|
|
}
|
|
v := l.checkAndCount(scopes)
|
|
if v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("2nd should violate")
|
|
}
|
|
if v.retryAfter != 30 {
|
|
t.Errorf("retryAfter = %d, want 30", v.retryAfter)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestWindowKeyFormat pins the exact key layout every store operation
|
|
// depends on: llmgw:{kind}:{id}:{metric}:{window}:{bucket}, with bucket
|
|
// formatted from t.UTC() at each window's granularity.
|
|
func TestWindowKeyFormat(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tm := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 4, 59, 0, time.FixedZone("UTC+1", 3600)) // 09:04:59 UTC
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
window string
|
|
want string
|
|
}{
|
|
{windowMin, "llmgw:user:a:req:min:202608200904"},
|
|
{windowDay, "llmgw:user:a:req:day:20260820"},
|
|
{windowMonth, "llmgw:user:a:req:month:202608"},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
if got := windowKey("user", "a", "req", c.window, tm); got != c.want {
|
|
t.Errorf("windowKey(..., %q, ...) = %q, want %q", c.window, got, c.want)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestMemoryStoreIncrAndGet exercises the fallback store directly: fresh
|
|
// keys start at n, repeated incrBy accumulates, and get on an unknown key
|
|
// returns 0 with no error.
|
|
func TestMemoryStoreIncrAndGet(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := newMemoryStore()
|
|
|
|
v, err := m.incrBy("k", 5, time.Minute)
|
|
if err != nil || v != 5 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("incrBy = %d, %v, want 5, nil", v, err)
|
|
}
|
|
v, err = m.incrBy("k", 3, time.Minute)
|
|
if err != nil || v != 8 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("incrBy = %d, %v, want 8, nil", v, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
got, err := m.get("k")
|
|
if err != nil || got != 8 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("get = %d, %v, want 8, nil", got, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
got, err = m.get("missing")
|
|
if err != nil || got != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("get missing = %d, %v, want 0, nil", got, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestMemoryStoreExpiry asserts a counter reset to 0 (as a fresh key) once
|
|
// its TTL has elapsed, rather than continuing to accumulate forever.
|
|
func TestMemoryStoreExpiry(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := newMemoryStore()
|
|
if _, err := m.incrBy("k", 5, time.Nanosecond); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
got, err := m.get("k")
|
|
if err != nil || got != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("get after expiry = %d, %v, want 0, nil", got, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
v, err := m.incrBy("k", 2, time.Minute)
|
|
if err != nil || v != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("incrBy after expiry = %d, %v, want 2, nil (fresh counter, not 7)", v, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestMemoryStoreSweepTimeGated asserts the sweep gate is purely
|
|
// time-based (sweepEvery), independent of how many keys memoryStore
|
|
// holds: an incrBy call before the gate elapses leaves an already-expired
|
|
// key physically in place (no scan happened), and the first incrBy at or
|
|
// past the gate reclaims it. Time is injected via m.nowFn so the test
|
|
// needs no real sleep and no size threshold to trigger the behavior.
|
|
func TestMemoryStoreSweepTimeGated(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := newMemoryStore()
|
|
fake := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
|
|
m.nowFn = func() time.Time { return fake }
|
|
|
|
// lastSweep starts at the zero time, so this first incrBy always
|
|
// sweeps (a no-op on an empty store) and sets lastSweep to fake.
|
|
if _, err := m.incrBy("k1", 1, time.Nanosecond); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// k1 is already expired (ttl was 1ns), but stay well inside the
|
|
// sweepEvery gate — the next incrBy must not scan, so k1 survives as
|
|
// a physical (if stale) map entry.
|
|
fake = fake.Add(time.Millisecond)
|
|
if _, err := m.incrBy("k2", 1, time.Minute); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if !memoryStoreHasKey(m, "k1") {
|
|
t.Fatal("k1 must still be present: the sweep gate has not elapsed yet")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Cross the sweepEvery boundary from the last sweep: this incrBy must
|
|
// scan and reclaim k1.
|
|
fake = fake.Add(sweepEvery)
|
|
if _, err := m.incrBy("k3", 1, time.Minute); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if memoryStoreHasKey(m, "k1") {
|
|
t.Error("k1 should have been swept once sweepEvery elapsed")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// memoryStoreHasKey reports whether key is physically present in m.data,
|
|
// bypassing get's expiry check — used to observe sweep timing directly.
|
|
func memoryStoreHasKey(m *memoryStore, key string) bool {
|
|
m.mu.Lock()
|
|
defer m.mu.Unlock()
|
|
_, ok := m.data[key]
|
|
return ok
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterCostBudgetRoundsUSDConversion pins usdToMicros' rounding
|
|
// against a value (8.2) where float64 representation sits just under the
|
|
// true value: a truncating int64(8.2*1e6) would undershoot to 8_199_999,
|
|
// making a spend of exactly $8.199999 look already over an intended
|
|
// $8.20 budget. With rounding, 8_199_999 must stay under budget and only
|
|
// the exact $8.20 spend violates.
|
|
func TestLimiterCostBudgetRoundsUSDConversion(t *testing.T) {
|
|
now := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
l.nowFn = func() time.Time { return now }
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "u", limits: &LimitsConfig{CostPerDayUSD: 8.2}}}
|
|
|
|
l.account(scopes, usage{}, 8_199_999)
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("spending $8.199999 against an $8.20 budget must not violate, got %+v", v)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
l.account(scopes, usage{}, 1) // now exactly at $8.20
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("spending exactly $8.20 against an $8.20 budget must violate")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestAccountSkipsZeroMetrics asserts account writes no tokens counter
|
|
// when usage totals 0, and no cost counter when costMicros is 0 — each
|
|
// metric's absence is independently observable via get.
|
|
func TestAccountSkipsZeroMetrics(t *testing.T) {
|
|
now := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
l.nowFn = func() time.Time { return now }
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "z", limits: nil}}
|
|
|
|
l.account(scopes, usage{}, 0)
|
|
|
|
tok, ok := l.getCounter("user", "z", metricTok, windowDay, now)
|
|
if !ok || tok != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("tok counter = %d, ok=%v, want 0, true", tok, ok)
|
|
}
|
|
cost, ok := l.getCounter("user", "z", metricCost, windowDay, now)
|
|
if !ok || cost != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("cost counter = %d, ok=%v, want 0, true", cost, ok)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterRequestPerDayLimit is carried-item (b): a per-day request
|
|
// limit blocks once the day's count exceeds it, independent of the
|
|
// (unset, unlimited) per-minute limit.
|
|
func TestLimiterRequestPerDayLimit(t *testing.T) {
|
|
now := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 0, 30, 0, time.UTC)
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
l.nowFn = func() time.Time { return now }
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "a", limits: &LimitsConfig{RequestsPerDay: 2}}}
|
|
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("1st should pass")
|
|
}
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("2nd should pass")
|
|
}
|
|
v := l.checkAndCount(scopes)
|
|
if v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("3rd should violate the day limit")
|
|
}
|
|
if v.storeDown {
|
|
t.Error("storeDown must be false for a real limit breach")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterTokensPerMonthBudget mirrors TestLimiterTokenBudget for the
|
|
// month window: accounting tokens past a month budget makes the next
|
|
// check refuse.
|
|
func TestLimiterTokensPerMonthBudget(t *testing.T) {
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "group", id: "g", limits: &LimitsConfig{TokensPerMonth: 100}}}
|
|
l.account(scopes, usage{prompt: 60, completion: 50}, 0) // 110 > 100
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("over month token budget must refuse")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiterCostPerMonthBudget mirrors TestLimiterCostBudget for the
|
|
// month window, and checks the violation carries the month window's
|
|
// Retry-After.
|
|
func TestLimiterCostPerMonthBudget(t *testing.T) {
|
|
now := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 0, 30, 0, time.UTC)
|
|
l := newLimiter(nil, true)
|
|
l.nowFn = func() time.Time { return now }
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "u", limits: &LimitsConfig{CostPerMonthUSD: 1.00}}}
|
|
|
|
l.account(scopes, usage{}, 1_500_000) // $1.50 > $1.00 budget
|
|
v := l.checkAndCount(scopes)
|
|
if v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("over month cost budget must refuse")
|
|
}
|
|
wantRetry := int(time.Date(2026, 9, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC).Sub(now).Seconds())
|
|
if v.retryAfter != wantRetry {
|
|
t.Errorf("retryAfter = %d, want %d (seconds to next UTC month start)", v.retryAfter, wantRetry)
|
|
}
|
|
if v.storeDown {
|
|
t.Error("storeDown must be false for a real limit breach")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// erroringStore is a counterStore stub that always fails, used to test the
|
|
// limiter's fail-open/fail-closed handling on a store error without a
|
|
// real network dependency (see redis_store_test.go for the equivalent
|
|
// end-to-end test against an unreachable redisStore).
|
|
type erroringStore struct {
|
|
err error
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (s *erroringStore) incrBy(string, int64, time.Duration) (int64, error) { return 0, s.err }
|
|
func (s *erroringStore) get(string) (int64, error) { return 0, s.err }
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiter_FailOpen_StoreErrorUsesFallback is carried-item (c): a store
|
|
// error with failOpen=true must not block the request — the operation
|
|
// transparently falls back to the limiter's in-process memoryStore, and
|
|
// the fallback counter actually advances (proving the write really
|
|
// happened somewhere, not just that no violation was reported).
|
|
func TestLimiter_FailOpen_StoreErrorUsesFallback(t *testing.T) {
|
|
store := &erroringStore{err: errors.New("boom")}
|
|
l := newLimiter(store, true)
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "u", limits: &LimitsConfig{RequestsPerMinute: 100}}}
|
|
|
|
if v := l.checkAndCount(scopes); v != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("want no violation with failOpen=true on a store error, got %+v", v)
|
|
}
|
|
got, err := l.fallback.get(windowKey("user", "u", metricReq, windowDay, l.now()))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("fallback.get: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if got != 1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("fallback req:day counter = %d, want 1", got)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiter_FailClosed_StoreErrorReturnsStoreDownViolation is
|
|
// carried-item (c): failOpen=false refuses the request outright on a
|
|
// store error, rather than silently using the fallback.
|
|
func TestLimiter_FailClosed_StoreErrorReturnsStoreDownViolation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
store := &erroringStore{err: errors.New("boom")}
|
|
l := newLimiter(store, false)
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "u", limits: &LimitsConfig{RequestsPerMinute: 100}}}
|
|
|
|
v := l.checkAndCount(scopes)
|
|
if v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("want a storeDown violation on a store error with failOpen=false")
|
|
}
|
|
if !v.storeDown {
|
|
t.Error("v.storeDown = false, want true")
|
|
}
|
|
if v.message != "limit store unavailable" {
|
|
t.Errorf("v.message = %q, want %q", v.message, "limit store unavailable")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiter_FailClosed_BudgetReadReturnsStoreDownViolation covers the
|
|
// budgetViolation fail-closed path specifically (as opposed to the
|
|
// request-counter incrCounter path covered above): a store error on a
|
|
// token/cost budget read also refuses the request when failOpen is false.
|
|
func TestLimiter_FailClosed_BudgetReadReturnsStoreDownViolation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
store := &erroringStore{err: errors.New("boom")}
|
|
l := newLimiter(store, false)
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "u", limits: &LimitsConfig{TokensPerDay: 100}}}
|
|
|
|
v := l.checkAndCount(scopes)
|
|
if v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("want a storeDown violation on a store error with failOpen=false")
|
|
}
|
|
if !v.storeDown {
|
|
t.Error("v.storeDown = false, want true")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiter_FailClosed_AccountDropsSampleOnStoreError asserts account
|
|
// drops a sample entirely — writes it nowhere — when failOpen=false and
|
|
// the store errors, rather than falling back to counting it locally (which
|
|
// would double-count once the store recovers). account has no error
|
|
// return to signal the drop, so this is observed via the fallback staying
|
|
// at 0.
|
|
func TestLimiter_FailClosed_AccountDropsSampleOnStoreError(t *testing.T) {
|
|
store := &erroringStore{err: errors.New("boom")}
|
|
l := newLimiter(store, false)
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "u", limits: nil}}
|
|
|
|
l.account(scopes, usage{prompt: 10, completion: 10}, 500)
|
|
|
|
got, err := l.fallback.get(windowKey("user", "u", metricTok, windowDay, l.now()))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("fallback.get: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if got != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("fallback tok:day counter = %d, want 0 (sample must be dropped, not counted locally)", got)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimiter_LogsStoreErrorOncePerRateLimit asserts a store error is
|
|
// logged via the limiter's injectable log func, rate-limited to once per
|
|
// storeErrorLogEvery — a store outage under load must not flood the log
|
|
// with one line per request, however many store operations fail within
|
|
// the window.
|
|
func TestLimiter_LogsStoreErrorOncePerRateLimit(t *testing.T) {
|
|
store := &erroringStore{err: errors.New("boom")}
|
|
l := newLimiter(store, true)
|
|
now := time.Date(2026, 8, 20, 10, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
|
|
l.nowFn = func() time.Time { return now }
|
|
|
|
var logged []string
|
|
l.logf = func(format string, args ...any) { logged = append(logged, fmt.Sprintf(format, args...)) }
|
|
|
|
scopes := []limitScope{{kind: "user", id: "u", limits: nil}}
|
|
|
|
l.checkAndCount(scopes) // two store ops (min, day) within one call
|
|
if len(logged) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("logged = %d lines after the first checkAndCount, want 1 (rate-limited)", len(logged))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
l.checkAndCount(scopes) // still inside the rate-limit window
|
|
if len(logged) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("logged = %d lines after a second call inside the window, want 1", len(logged))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
now = now.Add(storeErrorLogEvery)
|
|
l.checkAndCount(scopes)
|
|
if len(logged) != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("logged = %d lines after the rate-limit window elapsed, want 2", len(logged))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLimitsConfigValidate is carried-item (a): validate rejects
|
|
// NaN/±Inf/negative cost limits and negative int64 count limits, accepts
|
|
// zero/positive values, and treats a nil receiver (no limits configured
|
|
// at all) as valid.
|
|
func TestLimitsConfigValidate(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
lc *LimitsConfig
|
|
name string
|
|
wantErr bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{name: "nil is valid", lc: nil, wantErr: false},
|
|
{name: "zero value is valid", lc: &LimitsConfig{}, wantErr: false},
|
|
{name: "positive values are valid", lc: &LimitsConfig{
|
|
RequestsPerMinute: 1, RequestsPerDay: 1, TokensPerDay: 1, TokensPerMonth: 1,
|
|
CostPerDayUSD: 1.5, CostPerMonthUSD: 1.5,
|
|
}, wantErr: false},
|
|
{name: "negative RequestsPerMinute", lc: &LimitsConfig{RequestsPerMinute: -1}, wantErr: true},
|
|
{name: "negative RequestsPerDay", lc: &LimitsConfig{RequestsPerDay: -1}, wantErr: true},
|
|
{name: "negative TokensPerDay", lc: &LimitsConfig{TokensPerDay: -1}, wantErr: true},
|
|
{name: "negative TokensPerMonth", lc: &LimitsConfig{TokensPerMonth: -1}, wantErr: true},
|
|
{name: "negative CostPerDayUSD", lc: &LimitsConfig{CostPerDayUSD: -0.01}, wantErr: true},
|
|
{name: "negative CostPerMonthUSD", lc: &LimitsConfig{CostPerMonthUSD: -0.01}, wantErr: true},
|
|
{name: "NaN CostPerDayUSD", lc: &LimitsConfig{CostPerDayUSD: math.NaN()}, wantErr: true},
|
|
{name: "+Inf CostPerMonthUSD", lc: &LimitsConfig{CostPerMonthUSD: math.Inf(1)}, wantErr: true},
|
|
{name: "-Inf CostPerDayUSD", lc: &LimitsConfig{CostPerDayUSD: math.Inf(-1)}, wantErr: true},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
err := c.lc.validate()
|
|
if (err != nil) != c.wantErr {
|
|
t.Errorf("validate() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, c.wantErr)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|