Files
llm-testbench/internal/tests/whitepapers_systems_test.go
T
lukaszraczylo e7479e9169 test(catalog): expand research to 10 tests per subcategory
Add 9 tests to research/web, research/whitepapers, and
research/codebase, bringing each subcategory from 1 test to 10.

Web tests extract data from inline HTML, headers, and URLs, and
answer protocol scenarios for HTTP status codes, CORS, DNS, and
canonicalization. Every fixture stays inline; no test makes a live
web call.

Whitepaper tests each pair a 120 to 180 word, technically accurate
excerpt with numeric or JSON extraction questions. Topics cover
product quantization, Bloom filters, TF-IDF, recall@k, LSM-tree
write amplification, Raft quorum sizing, B-tree capacity, the CAP
theorem, and attention scaling. Every derived constant carries a
ground-truth comment and a unit test that recomputes the value with
an independent formula.

Codebase tests trace a Python function and a TypeScript function to
exact output, then reason over an inline diff, a data race, dead
code, Big-O complexity, an import cycle, a generic return type, and
a git-bisect scenario. The Python trace test runs the same source
through python3 when available and skips otherwise; the TypeScript
trace test cross-checks its hand-derivation against an equivalent Go
function.

New package-level helpers use a wp or code prefix to avoid name
collisions with sibling category authors sharing this package. Test
IDs keep the paper, web, and code prefixes already established by
the existing catalog entries. New tests omit MaxTokens so the runner
falls back to its default, per the catalog's authoring rules.

catalog_test.go's exact-map assertion now fails as expected, since
it still lists only the original 17-test catalog; that assertion is
owned centrally and is not touched here.
2026-08-17 01:51:11 +01:00

204 lines
5.7 KiB
Go

package tests
import (
"context"
"math"
"strings"
"testing"
)
func TestPaperLSMWriteAmpWant_GroundTruth(t *testing.T) {
// Independent re-derivation by counting the excerpt's stated rewrite
// path (L0->L1, L1->L2, L2->L3 = 3 rewrites) plus the original write,
// not via wpLSMWriteAmplification.
// The excerpt names exactly three compaction moves; check each phrase is
// present rather than counting "into L" substrings, since the initial
// "flushed into L0" also contains that substring without being a
// compaction rewrite.
moves := []string{"compacted into L1", "L1 into L2", "L2 into L3"}
rewrites := 0
for _, phrase := range moves {
if strings.Contains(paperLSMExcerpt, phrase) {
rewrites++
}
}
if rewrites != 3 {
t.Fatalf("excerpt describes %d of the 3 expected compaction moves", rewrites)
}
want := 1 + rewrites
if want != 4 {
t.Fatalf("independently recomputed write amplification = %d, want 4", want)
}
if paperLSMWriteAmpWant != want {
t.Errorf("paperLSMWriteAmpWant = %d, independently recomputed = %d", paperLSMWriteAmpWant, want)
}
}
func TestPaperLSMWriteAmplificationTest_Eval(t *testing.T) {
tc := paperLSMWriteAmplificationTest()
tests := []struct {
name string
response string
want float64
}{
{"correct", "4", 1},
{"prose wrapped", "The write amplification factor is 4.", 1},
{"forgot the original write", "3", 0},
{"off by one", "5", 0},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := tc.Eval.Evaluate(context.Background(), tt.response)
if got.Value != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Eval.Evaluate(%q) = %v, want %v (detail: %s)", tt.response, got.Value, tt.want, got.Detail)
}
})
}
}
func TestPaperRaftQuorumWant_GroundTruth(t *testing.T) {
// Independent re-derivation of floor(n/2)+1 and n-quorum for several N,
// not via wpRaftQuorumSize/wpRaftMaxTolerableFailures.
tests := []struct {
n int
wantQuorum int
wantFailures int
}{
{3, 2, 1},
{5, 3, 2},
{7, 4, 3},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
gotQuorum := tt.n/2 + 1
gotFailures := tt.n - gotQuorum
if gotQuorum != tt.wantQuorum {
t.Errorf("quorum(n=%d) = %d, want %d", tt.n, gotQuorum, tt.wantQuorum)
}
if gotFailures != tt.wantFailures {
t.Errorf("maxFailures(n=%d) = %d, want %d", tt.n, gotFailures, tt.wantFailures)
}
}
if paperRaftQuorumWant != 3 {
t.Errorf("paperRaftQuorumWant = %d, want 3", paperRaftQuorumWant)
}
if paperRaftFailuresWant != 2 {
t.Errorf("paperRaftFailuresWant = %d, want 2", paperRaftFailuresWant)
}
}
func TestPaperRaftQuorumFailuresTest_Eval(t *testing.T) {
tc := paperRaftQuorumFailuresTest()
tests := []struct {
name string
response string
want float64
}{
{"all correct", `{"quorum_size":3,"max_tolerable_failures":2}`, 1},
{"one field wrong", `{"quorum_size":3,"max_tolerable_failures":3}`, 0.5},
{"both wrong: used simple majority of reachable nodes", `{"quorum_size":2,"max_tolerable_failures":1}`, 0},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := tc.Eval.Evaluate(context.Background(), tt.response)
if got.Value != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Eval.Evaluate(%q) = %v, want %v (detail: %s)", tt.response, got.Value, tt.want, got.Detail)
}
})
}
}
func TestPaperBTreeHeightWant_GroundTruth(t *testing.T) {
// Independent re-derivation with math.Pow, not via
// wpBTreeMinBranchingLevels's iterative loop.
const f, n = 100.0, 5000000.0
h := 0
for math.Pow(f, float64(h+1)) < n {
h++
}
if h != 3 {
t.Fatalf("independently recomputed h = %d, want 3", h)
}
if paperBTreeHeightWant != h {
t.Errorf("paperBTreeHeightWant = %d, independently recomputed = %d", paperBTreeHeightWant, h)
}
}
func TestPaperBTreeHeightLevelsTest_Eval(t *testing.T) {
tc := paperBTreeHeightLevelsTest()
tests := []struct {
name string
response string
want float64
}{
{"correct", "3", 1},
{"prose wrapped", "The minimum height is h=3.", 1},
{"one level short", "2", 0},
{"one level too many", "4", 0},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := tc.Eval.Evaluate(context.Background(), tt.response)
if got.Value != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Eval.Evaluate(%q) = %v, want %v (detail: %s)", tt.response, got.Value, tt.want, got.Detail)
}
})
}
}
func TestPaperCAPAvailabilityChoiceTest_Eval(t *testing.T) {
tc := paperCAPAvailabilityChoiceTest()
tests := []struct {
name string
response string
want float64
}{
{"correct lowercase", "availability", 1},
{"correct capitalized", "Availability", 1},
{"correct with trailing period", "Availability.", 1},
{"wrong: consistency", "Consistency", 0},
{"wrong: extra words break the forced one-word format", "The answer is availability", 0},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := tc.Eval.Evaluate(context.Background(), tt.response)
if got.Value != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Eval.Evaluate(%q) = %v, want %v (detail: %s)", tt.response, got.Value, tt.want, got.Detail)
}
})
}
}
func TestPaperAttentionScaleFactorTest_Eval(t *testing.T) {
tc := paperAttentionScaleFactorTest()
// Ground truth: sqrt(64) = 8, independently recomputed with math.Sqrt.
if got := math.Sqrt(64); got != 8 {
t.Fatalf("math.Sqrt(64) = %v, want 8", got)
}
tests := []struct {
name string
response string
want float64
}{
{"all correct", `{"d_k":64,"scale_factor":8}`, 1},
{"one field wrong", `{"d_k":64,"scale_factor":64}`, 0.5},
{"both wrong", `{"d_k":512,"scale_factor":22.6}`, 0},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := tc.Eval.Evaluate(context.Background(), tt.response)
if got.Value != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Eval.Evaluate(%q) = %v, want %v (detail: %s)", tt.response, got.Value, tt.want, got.Detail)
}
})
}
}