mirror of
https://github.com/lukaszraczylo/claude-mnemonic.git
synced 2026-06-06 23:13:50 +00:00
5c2685c7b6
* feat(leann-phase2): implement hybrid vector storage and graph-based search
- [x] Add AST-aware code chunking for Go, Python, and TypeScript using tree-sitter
- [x] Implement LEANN-inspired hybrid vector storage with hub detection and selective embedding storage (60-80% savings)
- [x] Add observation relationship graph with CSR format and edge detection (file overlap, semantic similarity, temporal, concept)
- [x] Implement graph-aware search with two-level traversal and relationship-based ranking
- [x] Add auto-tuning system for dynamic hub threshold adjustment based on query performance
- [x] Add comprehensive metrics tracking for vector storage, queries, latency, and graph traversals
- [x] Update configuration system with graph and hybrid storage settings
- [x] Add graph stats and vector metrics endpoints to worker service
- [x] Enhance UI sidebar with advanced metrics display and graph visualization
- [x] Optimize struct field alignment throughout codebase for memory efficiency
- [x] Update documentation with LEANN Phase 2 features and performance benefits
- [x] Add tree-sitter dependency for AST parsing
* fix: add fts5 build tag to CI workflow
Pass build-tags: "fts5" to shared workflow to properly compile
sqlite-vec-go-bindings with SQLite FTS5 support.
This fixes test failures in hybrid vector storage tests that require
CGO and FTS5 build tags.
Requires shared-actions@8f7f235 or later.
* docs: add testing documentation and macOS ARM64 known issue
Document the macOS ARM64 CGO linking issue with sqlite-vec-go-bindings
that prevents hybrid package tests from compiling locally.
Added:
- .github/TESTING.md: Comprehensive testing guide with platform-specific
issues, workarounds, and CI configuration details
- internal/vector/hybrid/README.md: Package-specific documentation
explaining the macOS limitation
- .github/CI_FIX_SUMMARY.md: Technical details of the CI fix
Key points:
- 41 out of 42 packages test successfully on all platforms
- hybrid package tests fail only on macOS ARM64 (local dev issue)
- Linux CI tests pass with proper build-tags: "fts5" configuration
- Production builds and runtime functionality unaffected
This is a known limitation of sqlite-vec-go-bindings on macOS ARM64
and does not impact CI/CD or production deployments.
* fix: add SQLite busy_timeout to prevent database locked errors
Set PRAGMA busy_timeout=5000 (5 seconds) to allow SQLite to retry
when the database is locked instead of failing immediately.
This fixes race conditions when multiple goroutines try to write
simultaneously, particularly in tests where StoreObservation spawns
async cleanup goroutines.
Root cause:
- StoreObservation launches goroutine -> CleanupOldObservations
- Multiple concurrent cleanups caused "database is locked" errors
- Without busy_timeout, SQLite fails immediately on lock contention
Solution:
- Add 5-second busy timeout for automatic retry on lock
- Standard practice for concurrent SQLite usage
- Works with existing WAL mode configuration
Fixes TestObservationStore_CleanupOldObservations in CI.
* docs: complete summary of all CI test fixes
Comprehensive documentation of all fixes applied:
1. Missing build tags (fts5)
2. Database locked errors (busy_timeout)
All 41/42 packages now pass tests. The hybrid package has a known
macOS ARM64 limitation that doesn't affect CI or production.
No functionality was removed - all fixes are additive only.
* fix: add SQLite driver import to hybrid tests for CGO linking
Add blank import of mattn/go-sqlite3 to hybrid test files to ensure
the SQLite driver is linked into the test binary. This provides the
SQLite symbols that sqlite-vec-go-bindings requires.
Root cause:
- hybrid package imports sqlitevec (transitively depends on sqlite-vec CGO)
- Test binary needs SQLite symbols for linking
- sqlitevec tests already had this import, but hybrid tests didn't
- Without the driver import, linker fails with "undefined symbols"
This fix enables hybrid tests to run with -race flag on all platforms.
Before: 41/42 packages pass (hybrid failed to link)
After: 42/42 packages pass ✅
Fixes hybrid test compilation on macOS ARM64, Linux, and Windows.
* docs: remove outdated macOS limitation documentation
The hybrid test linking issue has been fixed by adding the SQLite
driver import. All tests now pass on all platforms including macOS.
Removed:
- internal/vector/hybrid/README.md (documented workaround no longer needed)
- .github/TESTING.md (macOS limitation section obsolete)
All 42/42 packages now test successfully with -race flag.
* docs: final comprehensive summary of all CI fixes
All three issues now resolved:
1. Missing fts5 build tags
2. Database busy_timeout for concurrent writes
3. Missing SQLite driver import in hybrid tests
Result: 42/42 packages pass with -race on all platforms.
Credit to reviewer for identifying the race detector concern.
259 lines
8.7 KiB
Go
259 lines
8.7 KiB
Go
// Package models contains domain models for claude-mnemonic.
|
|
package models
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"regexp"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"time"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// ConflictType represents the type of conflict between observations.
|
|
type ConflictType string
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
// ConflictSuperseded means newer observation supersedes older one (same topic, updated info).
|
|
ConflictSuperseded ConflictType = "superseded"
|
|
// ConflictContradicts means observations contain contradictory information.
|
|
ConflictContradicts ConflictType = "contradicts"
|
|
// ConflictOutdatedPattern means an outdated pattern/practice was identified.
|
|
ConflictOutdatedPattern ConflictType = "outdated_pattern"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// ConflictResolution indicates which observation to prefer.
|
|
type ConflictResolution string
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
// ResolutionPreferNewer means prefer the newer observation.
|
|
ResolutionPreferNewer ConflictResolution = "prefer_newer"
|
|
// ResolutionPreferOlder means prefer the older observation (rare).
|
|
ResolutionPreferOlder ConflictResolution = "prefer_older"
|
|
// ResolutionManual means manual review is needed.
|
|
ResolutionManual ConflictResolution = "manual"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// ObservationConflict tracks conflicting observations.
|
|
type ObservationConflict struct {
|
|
ResolvedAt *string `db:"resolved_at" json:"resolved_at,omitempty"`
|
|
ConflictType ConflictType `db:"conflict_type" json:"conflict_type"`
|
|
Resolution ConflictResolution `db:"resolution" json:"resolution"`
|
|
Reason string `db:"reason" json:"reason"`
|
|
DetectedAt string `db:"detected_at" json:"detected_at"`
|
|
ID int64 `db:"id" json:"id"`
|
|
NewerObsID int64 `db:"newer_obs_id" json:"newer_obs_id"`
|
|
OlderObsID int64 `db:"older_obs_id" json:"older_obs_id"`
|
|
DetectedAtEpoch int64 `db:"detected_at_epoch" json:"detected_at_epoch"`
|
|
Resolved bool `db:"resolved" json:"resolved"`
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ConflictDetectionResult contains the result of conflict detection.
|
|
type ConflictDetectionResult struct {
|
|
Type ConflictType
|
|
Resolution ConflictResolution
|
|
Reason string
|
|
OlderObsIDs []int64
|
|
HasConflict bool
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// NewObservationConflict creates a new conflict record.
|
|
func NewObservationConflict(newerID, olderID int64, conflictType ConflictType, resolution ConflictResolution, reason string) *ObservationConflict {
|
|
now := time.Now()
|
|
return &ObservationConflict{
|
|
NewerObsID: newerID,
|
|
OlderObsID: olderID,
|
|
ConflictType: conflictType,
|
|
Resolution: resolution,
|
|
Reason: reason,
|
|
DetectedAt: now.Format(time.RFC3339),
|
|
DetectedAtEpoch: now.UnixMilli(),
|
|
Resolved: false,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CorrectionPatterns contains regex patterns that indicate explicit corrections.
|
|
var CorrectionPatterns = []*regexp.Regexp{
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bactually[,\s]+that\s+was\s+wrong\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bactually[,\s]+that's\s+(wrong|incorrect|not\s+right)\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bpreviously\s+(said|mentioned|noted)\s+.*\s+but\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bcorrection:\s*`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bignore\s+(the\s+)?(previous|earlier)\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bdisregard\s+(the\s+)?(previous|earlier)\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bwas\s+(wrong|incorrect|mistaken)\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bturns\s+out\s+.*(wrong|incorrect|not\s+the\s+case)\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\b(supersedes|replaces|overrides)\s+(the\s+)?(previous|earlier|old)\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\b(don't|do\s+not)\s+use\s+.*\s+anymore\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bno\s+longer\s+(valid|applicable|correct|recommended)\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bdeprecated\s+(approach|method|pattern|way)\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bshould\s+have\s+(been|used)\b.*instead\b`),
|
|
regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)\bbetter\s+(approach|way|method|solution)\s+is\b`),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// OpposingChangePatterns detects add/remove conflicts.
|
|
var OpposingChangePatterns = map[string]string{
|
|
"add": "remove",
|
|
"added": "removed",
|
|
"create": "delete",
|
|
"created": "deleted",
|
|
"enable": "disable",
|
|
"enabled": "disabled",
|
|
"include": "exclude",
|
|
"allow": "deny",
|
|
"permit": "block",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// DetectExplicitCorrection checks if text contains explicit correction language.
|
|
func DetectExplicitCorrection(text string) (bool, string) {
|
|
for _, pattern := range CorrectionPatterns {
|
|
if match := pattern.FindString(text); match != "" {
|
|
return true, "Explicit correction detected: " + match
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return false, ""
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// DetectOpposingFileChanges checks if two observations have opposing changes on the same file.
|
|
func DetectOpposingFileChanges(newer, older *Observation) (bool, string) {
|
|
// Check for overlapping modified files
|
|
newerFiles := make(map[string]bool)
|
|
for _, f := range newer.FilesModified {
|
|
newerFiles[f] = true
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var overlappingFiles []string
|
|
for _, f := range older.FilesModified {
|
|
if newerFiles[f] {
|
|
overlappingFiles = append(overlappingFiles, f)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(overlappingFiles) == 0 {
|
|
return false, ""
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check for opposing action words in titles/narratives
|
|
newerText := strings.ToLower(newer.Title.String + " " + newer.Narrative.String)
|
|
olderText := strings.ToLower(older.Title.String + " " + older.Narrative.String)
|
|
|
|
for action, opposite := range OpposingChangePatterns {
|
|
if (strings.Contains(newerText, action) && strings.Contains(olderText, opposite)) ||
|
|
(strings.Contains(newerText, opposite) && strings.Contains(olderText, action)) {
|
|
return true, "Opposing changes on files: " + strings.Join(overlappingFiles, ", ")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false, ""
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// DetectConceptTagMismatch checks if observations have same concepts but different recommendations.
|
|
func DetectConceptTagMismatch(newer, older *Observation) (bool, string) {
|
|
// Find overlapping concepts
|
|
newerConcepts := make(map[string]bool)
|
|
for _, c := range newer.Concepts {
|
|
newerConcepts[c] = true
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var overlapping []string
|
|
for _, c := range older.Concepts {
|
|
if newerConcepts[c] {
|
|
overlapping = append(overlapping, c)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(overlapping) == 0 {
|
|
return false, ""
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check if same file was modified and concepts overlap
|
|
// This suggests the newer observation may update the approach
|
|
newerFiles := make(map[string]bool)
|
|
for _, f := range newer.FilesModified {
|
|
newerFiles[f] = true
|
|
}
|
|
for _, f := range older.FilesModified {
|
|
if newerFiles[f] {
|
|
// Same file modified with same concepts - likely an update
|
|
return true, "Same concepts (" + strings.Join(overlapping, ", ") + ") with overlapping file changes"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false, ""
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// DetectConflict performs comprehensive conflict detection between a new observation
|
|
// and an existing one. Returns detection result.
|
|
func DetectConflict(newer, older *Observation) *ConflictDetectionResult {
|
|
result := &ConflictDetectionResult{
|
|
HasConflict: false,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 1. Check for explicit correction language in newer observation
|
|
if newer.Narrative.Valid {
|
|
if isCorrection, reason := DetectExplicitCorrection(newer.Narrative.String); isCorrection {
|
|
result.HasConflict = true
|
|
result.Type = ConflictContradicts
|
|
result.Resolution = ResolutionPreferNewer
|
|
result.Reason = reason
|
|
result.OlderObsIDs = append(result.OlderObsIDs, older.ID)
|
|
return result
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check title as well
|
|
if newer.Title.Valid {
|
|
if isCorrection, reason := DetectExplicitCorrection(newer.Title.String); isCorrection {
|
|
result.HasConflict = true
|
|
result.Type = ConflictContradicts
|
|
result.Resolution = ResolutionPreferNewer
|
|
result.Reason = reason
|
|
result.OlderObsIDs = append(result.OlderObsIDs, older.ID)
|
|
return result
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 2. Check for opposing file changes
|
|
if isOpposing, reason := DetectOpposingFileChanges(newer, older); isOpposing {
|
|
result.HasConflict = true
|
|
result.Type = ConflictSuperseded
|
|
result.Resolution = ResolutionPreferNewer
|
|
result.Reason = reason
|
|
result.OlderObsIDs = append(result.OlderObsIDs, older.ID)
|
|
return result
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 3. Check for concept tag mismatches with same files
|
|
if isMismatch, reason := DetectConceptTagMismatch(newer, older); isMismatch {
|
|
result.HasConflict = true
|
|
result.Type = ConflictSuperseded
|
|
result.Resolution = ResolutionPreferNewer
|
|
result.Reason = reason
|
|
result.OlderObsIDs = append(result.OlderObsIDs, older.ID)
|
|
return result
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return result
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// DetectConflictsWithExisting checks a new observation against a list of existing observations.
|
|
// Returns all detected conflicts.
|
|
func DetectConflictsWithExisting(newer *Observation, existing []*Observation) []*ConflictDetectionResult {
|
|
var results []*ConflictDetectionResult
|
|
|
|
for _, older := range existing {
|
|
// Skip self-comparison
|
|
if older.ID == newer.ID {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Only compare within same project (or both global)
|
|
if newer.Project != older.Project && newer.Scope != ScopeGlobal && older.Scope != ScopeGlobal {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
result := DetectConflict(newer, older)
|
|
if result.HasConflict {
|
|
results = append(results, result)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return results
|
|
}
|